You may also like...
-
Kiran Bedi accuses Puducherry CM of holding file on law officers’ tenure extension
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 8, 2020
-
Justice P N Prakash and Justice B Pugalendhi said that since the family members of the victims would be under great stress, the JM may go to Sathankulam for recording their statements. The JM should visit the house of the victim to conduct inquest as the women folk would be in mourning. REMOVE ADSThe JM should visit the police station, sub-jail and collect necessary documents such as medical records for better appreciation of the facts. Photographs and CCTV footage can also be collected wherever necessary. The judges observed that they were not interfering in the manner in which the inquest is conducted and directed adequate facilities and protection be ensured for the JM.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 27, 2020
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.592 of 2021 Moorthi … Appellant Before parting with the case, this court places on record its appreciation to the Learned Counsel for the appellant, who despite all the facts stacked against the appellant/accused, had left no stone unturned to defend the accused by raising all the points, but still arguing in a manner befitting as the officer of this Court. 29.07.2022. For Appellant : Mr.S.Subramaniya for Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 3, 2022