SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

விதிமீறல்களை சுட்டிக்காட்டாமல், திட்டங்கள் குறித்து பொதுமக்கள் கேள்வி எழுப்பும் மேடையாக பொது நல வழக்குகளை தரம் குறைக்க முடியாது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

Uncategorized

விதிமீறல்களை சுட்டிக்காட்டாமல், திட்டங்கள் குறித்து பொதுமக்கள் கேள்வி எழுப்பும் மேடையாக பொது நல வழக்குகளை தரம் குறைக்க முடியாது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

சட்ட விதிமீறல்களை சுட்டிக்காட்டாமல், திட்டங்கள் குறித்து பொதுமக்கள் கேள்வி எழுப்பும் மேடையாக பொது நல வழக்குகளை தரம் குறைக்க முடியாது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. கள்ளக்குறிச்சி மாவட்டம், திருக்கோயிலூரில், உலகளந்த பெருமாள் கோவில் அருகில் புதிய பேருந்து நிலையம் கட்ட தடை விதிக்கக் கோரி, சென்னை...

“ Home > Top Stories > Supreme Court Judgments > High Courts Cannot Grant… High Courts Cannot Grant Civil Relief Through Anticipatory Bail Conditions: Supreme Court The Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court’s condition restraining accused from interfering with disputed property, holding that criminal courts cannot effectively grant relief pending in a civil suit. By : Lawbeat News Desk -SC By : Edits by Salil Tiwari Update: 2026-06-13 13:20 GMT The Supreme Court held that conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail cannot amount to granting relief that is yet to be decided by a civil court.    The Supreme Court recently held that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a high court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a pending civil suit. A Bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a Madras High Court order dated February 24, 2026.” https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/high-courts-cannot-grant-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-conditions-supreme-court-1601567#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20recently,dated%20February

Uncategorized

“ Home > Top Stories > Supreme Court Judgments > High Courts Cannot Grant… High Courts Cannot Grant Civil Relief Through Anticipatory Bail Conditions: Supreme Court The Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court’s condition restraining accused from interfering with disputed property, holding that criminal courts cannot effectively grant relief pending in a civil suit. By : Lawbeat News Desk -SC By : Edits by Salil Tiwari Update: 2026-06-13 13:20 GMT The Supreme Court held that conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail cannot amount to granting relief that is yet to be decided by a civil court.    The Supreme Court recently held that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a high court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a pending civil suit. A Bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a Madras High Court order dated February 24, 2026.” https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/high-courts-cannot-grant-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-conditions-supreme-court-1601567#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20recently,dated%20February

[14/06, 19:54] sekarreporter1: “ Home > Top Stories > Supreme Court Judgments > High Courts Cannot Grant… High Courts Cannot Grant Civil Relief Through Anticipatory Bail Conditions: Supreme Court The Supreme Court sets aside...

Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868

Uncategorized

Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868

Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A...

Uncategorized

Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari + Justice G. Arul Murugan_. *PIL Misuse + Temple + Bus Stand + Planning Decisions + Unsubstantiated Pleas*. *HJS PIL Jurisprudence, UPSC GS-2*

[14/06, 08:31] sekarreporter1: “The Madras High Court has observed that the PIL petitions cannot be filed without undeniable infringement of statutory rules and without substantial materials. The first bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind...

http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPIbYc66l3HQRKY91GWTK2P6QQ6GePTFk?si=Q_Zu7fkSNDAlpjzF [14/06, 08:07] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority

Uncategorized

http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPIbYc66l3HQRKY91GWTK2P6QQ6GePTFk?si=Q_Zu7fkSNDAlpjzF [14/06, 08:07] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority

[14/06, 08:06] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPIbYc66l3HQRKY91GWTK2P6QQ6GePTFk?si=Q_Zu7fkSNDAlpjzF [14/06, 08:07] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services...

Uncategorized

HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.(MD).No.651 of 2010 1.Varghese [Died] 2.Rani 3.Sahaya Chandran 4.Sasi Malar 5.Arul Solan 6.Mary Sabitha 7.Sasi Ajitha … Plaintiffs / Appellants **Appellants 2 to 7

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON 02.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.(MD).No.651 of 2010 1.Varghese [Died] 2.Rani 3.Sahaya Chandran 4.Sasi Malar 5.Arul Solan 6.Mary Sabitha 7.Sasi Ajitha...

http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had

Uncategorized

http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had

[13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com