You may also like...
The tribunal had on Dec. 31, 2018 directed the Centre to return the amount after encashing bank guarantee of ₹908 crore against spectrum charges of ₹774 crore The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the Centre’s plea challenging TDSAT’s order directing refund of around ₹104 crore to Reliance Communication. A bench of justices R.F.Nariman and S. Ravindra Bhat said, “We don’t find any merits in the appeal”.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 7, 2020
rabu Manogar: Blogs CAA is necessary: Why the many arguments about its being unconstitutional don’t hold water March 5, 2020, 6:00 AM IST Harish Salve in TOI Edit Page | Edit Page, India, World | TOI The controversy over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act appears to simmer – and of late has led to communal riots. I have failed hopelessly to comprehend what the controversy is all about.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 5, 2020
Full order W.P. No. 5178 of 2021—-The 3rd respondent shall file all documents to prove his community status before this Court so that this Court could pass appropriate orders. It is made clear that the matter will be decided on the next hearing date itself. 8. Post on 09.07.2021. (N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) 25.06.2021 N. KIRUBAKARAN,J. AND T.V. THAMILSELVI,J. (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) The matter is heard through videoconferencing. 2. The petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent, who got elected as President of Ayyarnapalli Village Panchayat, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District which is reserved for ST community, does not belong to ST community and he belongs to “Vakkaligar” community, which is a Backward Class community. By falsely declaring his community status as “Kuruchchan” community classified as a Scheduled Tribe in the nomination form dated 14.12.2019, the 3rd respondent got elected as President of Ayyanarpalli Panchayat, which is exclusively reserved for Scheduled Tribe.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2021