![Sekarreporter: SC judgement on Land Acquisition. [7/1, 17:53] Sekarreporter: [7/1, 17:50] Sekarreporter: REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1411 OF 2020 G. MOHAN RAO & ORS. …PETITIONER(S) versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) with WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 173 OF 2021 WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 174 OF 2021 J U D G M E N T](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story திமுக எம்எல்ஏக்கள் வழக்கு mhc gp jayaprakash narayanan interview video மீண்டும் நோட்டீசு அனுப்பனுமாம்
- Previous story Gutkha row: Privilege notice against Stalin, 18 DMK MLAs set aside by Madras HC The court, however, said it was up to the Privileges Committee to reexamine the issue.
Recent Posts
- WP filed by TR Ramesh challenging the amendment to the Rule brought in by TN Government permitting the investment of surplus funds of temples administered by HR and CE department across the state.in Tamil Nadu Power
- Division Bench of Justices GRS and VLN admit TR Ramesh’s writ petition challenging Deposit and Investment Rules amended under HR&CE Act, 1959 [28/05, 13:47] sekarreporter1: 1. TN Power Finance has accepted more deposits from Public that is beyond the permissible limits by Reserve Bank Of India.
- Madras High Court ruled a child ‘must not grow up without his father’ Why Madras High Court ruled a child ‘must not grow up without his father’ During the previous hearing the mother claimed that the child had gone for an educational tour, on which the Madras High Court expressed skepticism and granted interim custody of child to father
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. No. 20028 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.21410 and 21415 of 2026 1. P.Saravanan 2. C.Mathiarasan ..Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Secretary to Government Department of Home, Prohibition and Excise, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 3. The Director,
- [27/05, 20:06] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner : Mr.N.Seshadhri For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 Mr.T.Gowthaman, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R3 and R5 Mr.R.John Satyan, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.C.R.Malarvannan – for R2, R4, R6 and R7 Order (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/cow-slaughter-order-grsj-bench/#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%20%3A,R.Swaminathan%20J.) [27/05, 20:10] sekarreporter1: [27/05, 20:08] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxFZeOdn-Wv-Ss2jCWBuqlVGr8RVdVrpjB?si=vWsiualtXgaoK1C- [27/05, 20:08] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner : Mr.N.Seshadhri For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 Mr.T.Gowthaman, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R3 and R5 Mr.R.John Satyan, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.C.R.Malarvannan – for R2, R4, R6 and R7 Order (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/cow-slaughter-order-grsj-bench/#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%20%3A,R.Swaminathan%20J.)
More
Recent Posts
- WP filed by TR Ramesh challenging the amendment to the Rule brought in by TN Government permitting the investment of surplus funds of temples administered by HR and CE department across the state.in Tamil Nadu Power
- Division Bench of Justices GRS and VLN admit TR Ramesh’s writ petition challenging Deposit and Investment Rules amended under HR&CE Act, 1959 [28/05, 13:47] sekarreporter1: 1. TN Power Finance has accepted more deposits from Public that is beyond the permissible limits by Reserve Bank Of India.
- Madras High Court ruled a child ‘must not grow up without his father’ Why Madras High Court ruled a child ‘must not grow up without his father’ During the previous hearing the mother claimed that the child had gone for an educational tour, on which the Madras High Court expressed skepticism and granted interim custody of child to father
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. No. 20028 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.21410 and 21415 of 2026 1. P.Saravanan 2. C.Mathiarasan ..Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Secretary to Government Department of Home, Prohibition and Excise, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 3. The Director,
- [27/05, 20:06] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner : Mr.N.Seshadhri For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 Mr.T.Gowthaman, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R3 and R5 Mr.R.John Satyan, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.C.R.Malarvannan – for R2, R4, R6 and R7 Order (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/cow-slaughter-order-grsj-bench/#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%20%3A,R.Swaminathan%20J.) [27/05, 20:10] sekarreporter1: [27/05, 20:08] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxFZeOdn-Wv-Ss2jCWBuqlVGr8RVdVrpjB?si=vWsiualtXgaoK1C- [27/05, 20:08] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner : Mr.N.Seshadhri For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 Mr.T.Gowthaman, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Guruprasad for R3 and R5 Mr.R.John Satyan, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.C.R.Malarvannan – for R2, R4, R6 and R7 Order (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/cow-slaughter-order-grsj-bench/#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%20%3A,R.Swaminathan%20J.)