You may also like...
-
result, this Court issues the following directions:- i) the Home Secretary as well as the Director General of Police shall suitably issue a direction to comply the above direction ii) Further, it is directed to supervise the above compliance of the direction through a high level team. Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals are dismissed with above directions. The judgment dated 16.07.2019 made in S.C.No.137 of 2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram, is confirmed. Post this matter for reporting compliance on 11.2023. [R.S.K.,J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.] 23.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No dss/pjl To 1.The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Madurai Town, Kenikarai Police Station, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.SURESHKUMAR, J. and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. dss/pjl Pre delivery Judgment made in Crl.A.(MD)Nos.423 of 2019 and 181 of 2021 23.08.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 12, 2023
-
Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Petitioners acquitted in a false criminal case – separate charge memo filed – After delay of 9 years. Held: Department cannot file second charge memo for the same facts and circumstances of first charge memo – Inordinate and unexplained delay of 9 years in filing charge memo – Writ petitions allowed – Court also directed the Government to issue revised guidelines for timely filing of charge memo as and if needed – revised guidelines published
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 14, 2022
-