![Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1958157538102579422?s=46 [20/08, 19:06] Sekarreporter: The 130th Constitution Amendment Bill moved by Home Minister Amit Shah is clearly part of a diabolical plan to turn Indian into a dictatorship. These moves mirror the moves made](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story -supreme-court-single-judge-bench-to-hear-cases-from-wednesday-to-reduce-backlog-of-cases
- Previous story Mhc advt.rajasekaran filed tasmac caveat petition in SC on behalf of Rajasekar senior advt Manees divari will argue
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_
More
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_