You may also like...
-
P chandrasekar interview regarding common symbol case
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 16, 2021
-
15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 20, 2022
-
Ews case full order of 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL/CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019 JANHIT ABHIYAN …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA …RESPONDENT(S) WITH T.C.(C) No. 8/2021, W.P.(C) No. 596/2019, W.P.(C) No. 446/2019, W.P.(C) No. 427/2019, W.P. (C) No. 331/2019, W.P.(C) No. 343/2019, W.P.(C) No. 798/2019, W.P. (C) No. 732/2019, W.P. (C) No. 854/2019, T.C. (C) No. 12/2021, T.C.(C) No.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 7, 2022
