Follow:
Recent Posts
- https://youtu.be/SyTpOcTxgiM?si=oQFuNgZNEsIEekOA
- Ganesan Judge: Sir , the very mandate of the family court Act 1984 is that it strictly prohibits the very publication of the family court proceeding in any website or portals of the family court as it would amounts to or attempts to invade the privacy of the people who comes to family courts for reliefs under their personal law . As india is predominantly populated with hindu majoritarian secular country by law established, even the right royal way of entry of advocates to prosecute and defend a matter is restricted rather prohibited and the lawyer can appear only to assist the court as the friend of the court and not as lawyer of either side as the family courts Act given such. omelets discretion to the presiding officer of the family courts in family court area and the other courts such safeguards is not available and it is still an anomaly persisting in a family court area and a non- family court area . Due this anomaly, from the decision of family fort appeal lies to high court to be dealt by two judge bench and where as if the same power is exercised by a sub judge in a non family court area , the appeal would lie only the district court . Though the entry of lawyers are completely under the rigorous filtering mechanism of the family court judges , no judge in family court used to refuse the petition filed by the parties seeking to nominate and appoint counsel either to prosecute or defend a matter before family courts . The restricted entry has been more or less made as a wind and the family courts are the place flooded with lawyers
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/section-of-media-misquoted-me-criticised-only-those-who-join-professions-with-fake-degrees-cji-surya-kant-clarifies-remarks-on-youth-534448 [16/05, 19:03] Meta AI: *“Section Of Media Misquoted Me, Criticised Only Those Who Join Professions With Fake Degrees: CJI Surya Kant Clarifies Remarks On Youth”* _LiveLaw | May 16, 2026, 3:46 PM_
- Contempt plea update: Amita Sachdeva v Udhayanidhi Stalin | http://Conmt.Pet.(C) 1235/2023* _LiveLaw report | Fresh IA filed May 2026_ *1. What’s the new application about* An *Interlocutory Application* has been filed in the pending contempt petition flagging Udhayanidhi Stalin’s *May 12, 2026* remarks in TN Assembly.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/lawyer-brings-to-supreme-courts-notice-udhayanidhi-stalins-remarks-against-sanatana-dharma-in-tn-assembly-534461 [16/05, 18:46] sekarreporter1: An application has been filed bringing to the notice of the Supreme Court the recent comments made by Tamil Nadu Leader of the Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin against Sanatana Dharma, calling for its abolition.
More
Recent Posts
- https://youtu.be/SyTpOcTxgiM?si=oQFuNgZNEsIEekOA
- Ganesan Judge: Sir , the very mandate of the family court Act 1984 is that it strictly prohibits the very publication of the family court proceeding in any website or portals of the family court as it would amounts to or attempts to invade the privacy of the people who comes to family courts for reliefs under their personal law . As india is predominantly populated with hindu majoritarian secular country by law established, even the right royal way of entry of advocates to prosecute and defend a matter is restricted rather prohibited and the lawyer can appear only to assist the court as the friend of the court and not as lawyer of either side as the family courts Act given such. omelets discretion to the presiding officer of the family courts in family court area and the other courts such safeguards is not available and it is still an anomaly persisting in a family court area and a non- family court area . Due this anomaly, from the decision of family fort appeal lies to high court to be dealt by two judge bench and where as if the same power is exercised by a sub judge in a non family court area , the appeal would lie only the district court . Though the entry of lawyers are completely under the rigorous filtering mechanism of the family court judges , no judge in family court used to refuse the petition filed by the parties seeking to nominate and appoint counsel either to prosecute or defend a matter before family courts . The restricted entry has been more or less made as a wind and the family courts are the place flooded with lawyers
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/section-of-media-misquoted-me-criticised-only-those-who-join-professions-with-fake-degrees-cji-surya-kant-clarifies-remarks-on-youth-534448 [16/05, 19:03] Meta AI: *“Section Of Media Misquoted Me, Criticised Only Those Who Join Professions With Fake Degrees: CJI Surya Kant Clarifies Remarks On Youth”* _LiveLaw | May 16, 2026, 3:46 PM_
- Contempt plea update: Amita Sachdeva v Udhayanidhi Stalin | http://Conmt.Pet.(C) 1235/2023* _LiveLaw report | Fresh IA filed May 2026_ *1. What’s the new application about* An *Interlocutory Application* has been filed in the pending contempt petition flagging Udhayanidhi Stalin’s *May 12, 2026* remarks in TN Assembly.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/lawyer-brings-to-supreme-courts-notice-udhayanidhi-stalins-remarks-against-sanatana-dharma-in-tn-assembly-534461 [16/05, 18:46] sekarreporter1: An application has been filed bringing to the notice of the Supreme Court the recent comments made by Tamil Nadu Leader of the Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin against Sanatana Dharma, calling for its abolition.