13/03, 15:08] sekarreporter1: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice P. Dhanabal observed, “Just because A1 happened to be the wife of the deceased, it cannot be assumed that she will always be present with the deceased inside the house. Some witness had to necessarily speak about her presence in the house prior to the incident or atleast the previous day, since the incident is said to have

[13/03, 15:08] sekarreporter1: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice P. Dhanabal observed, “Just because A1 happened to be the wife of the deceased, it cannot be assumed that she will always be present with the deceased inside the house. Some witness had to necessarily speak about her presence in the house prior to the incident or atleast the previous day, since the incident is said to have taken place early in the morning at 2.00 a.m. If this foundational fact is not established, Section 106 of the Act will not come into play.””
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/selvi-v-the-state-2026mhc961-s-106-evidence-act-husband-wife-last-seen-together-theory-murder-1609800#:~:text=Justice%20N.%20Anand,come%20into%20play.%E2%80%9D
[13/03, 15:08] Meta AI: மதறாஸ் HC-யில் நீதிபதிகள் ஆனந்த் வெங்கடேஷ், தனபால் கூறியது: A1 மனைவி என்பதாலே, சம்பவ நேரத்தில் வீட்டில் இருந்தார் என்று கருத முடியாது; முந்தைய நாள் அவர் இருந்தார் என்பதை சாட்சி நிரூபிக்க வேண்டும், இல்லையெனில் சாட்சிய சட்டம் 106 பொருந்தாது.