![[Media Trial In Sushant Singh Rajput Case] Live-Updates Of Hearing From Bombay High Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/media-trial-in-sushant-singh-rajput-case-live-updates-of-hearing-from-bombay-high-court-164863](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined Solely On Income; Social Status Of Parents Must Also Be Considered In UPSC OBC Claims: Supreme Court https://share.google/pSe35NUTfXjKh2fsI [13/03, 08:40] sekarreporter1: menu_bar Verdictum Workplace Home > Court Updates > Supreme Court > Creamy Layer Cannot Be… Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined
- Previous story Land mark order bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice R Mahadevan granted relief to several UPSC candidates, who were denied appointments despite clearing the Civil Service Examinations, as they were wrongly included in the creamy layer category.
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP No. 6760 of 2026 and WMP.No. 7330 of 2026 N.Sundar ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector VOC Nagar, Kallkurichi 606 202 2. The Assistant Director
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/police-pay-compensation-closing-dowry-complaint-not-registering-fir-542812 [24/07, 19:20] Meta AI: *Case #202: _Madras HC on Police Liability*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: Dowry Complaint + FIR + Compensation + Art 21 + Police Dereliction of Duty* *Source*:
- The Supreme Court on Friday orally observed that the Bar Council of India’s decision to increase the number of seats in State Bar Councils
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx04u7ZFxoSo13IpVwEINZqkuhg_jgnehX?si=AGEsiJmJPID41bCY bar council resolution stayed
- https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/breaking-supreme-court-bans-uploading-sharing-of-audio-video-recordings-of-court-hearings-without-prior-permission-542719 [24/07, 14:06] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Friday passed an interim order prohibiting the extraction, editing, dissemination, reposting, uploading or monetisation of audio and video recordings of judicial proceedings on social media and other digital platforms without prior permission from the concerned court.
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP No. 6760 of 2026 and WMP.No. 7330 of 2026 N.Sundar ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector VOC Nagar, Kallkurichi 606 202 2. The Assistant Director
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/police-pay-compensation-closing-dowry-complaint-not-registering-fir-542812 [24/07, 19:20] Meta AI: *Case #202: _Madras HC on Police Liability*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: Dowry Complaint + FIR + Compensation + Art 21 + Police Dereliction of Duty* *Source*:
- The Supreme Court on Friday orally observed that the Bar Council of India’s decision to increase the number of seats in State Bar Councils
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx04u7ZFxoSo13IpVwEINZqkuhg_jgnehX?si=AGEsiJmJPID41bCY bar council resolution stayed
- https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/breaking-supreme-court-bans-uploading-sharing-of-audio-video-recordings-of-court-hearings-without-prior-permission-542719 [24/07, 14:06] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court on Friday passed an interim order prohibiting the extraction, editing, dissemination, reposting, uploading or monetisation of audio and video recordings of judicial proceedings on social media and other digital platforms without prior permission from the concerned court.