The Madras High Court has expressed strong disapproval of the Tamil Nadu government’s handling of a sexual assault case involving a 10-year-old girl in Anna Nagar, Chennai. The court criticized the police for violating the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and directed the state government to file a status report on departmental action taken against the erring police officials.
[30/01, 10:39] Sekarreporter: TNIE Logo white
NATION
WORLD
STATES
OPINION
CITIES
BUSINESS
SPORT
GOOD NEWS
MOVIES
LIFESTYLE
VIDEOS
WEB SCRAWL
Advertisement
Tamil Nadu
Can’t tolerate violation of Pocso Act provisions by police: Madras HC raps TN government
Seeks report on departmental action against cop for lapses in Anna Nagar sexual assault case
Madras High Court
Madras High Court(File photo | Express)
R Sivakumar
Updated on:
30 Jan 2026, 8:08 am
2 min read
Add TNIE As A Trusted Source
CHENNAI: Stating that the court cannot tolerate violation of the provisions Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act by police officials, the Madras High Court on Thursday criticised the state government for the lethargy in taking departmental action against the police officials who were charged with non-adherence to the statutory provisions while holding investigations into the sexual assault of a 10-year-old child in Anna Nagar, Chennai.
A division bench of justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman commented that half of the police officers do not know the nitty-gritty of the Pocso Act and they are not properly implementing the law. The comments were made while hearing a 2024 habeas corpus petition filed by the victim’s mother seeking certain directions, including enhanced compensation and action against the woman police inspector who had committed violations in recording the victim’s statement and by thrashing the parents. The incident, then, had created widespread outrage and the high court took suo motu cognisance and ordered a CBI probe, but the Supreme Court, on appeal, set up a special investigation team (SIT).
Additional Advocate General J Ravindran informed the bench that compensation was paid to the victim as per the directions of a division bench and further decision, on this matter, has to be taken by the trial court.
Advertisement
Referring to the action against the erring police official, he said the officer was placed under suspension and a criminal case was registered for violation of the procedures. However, the bench said suspension is not a punishment but departmental action should have been taken against officials for not following the statutory provisions.
“Action for violation of statutory provisions is different from criminal action. If any public servant does not follow the statutory provisions, departmental action must be initiated against such official,” the bench said. Referring to the submission of the petitioner’s counsel that the violations included disclosure of the victim’s identity, the bench remarked that it is like the fence grazing the crop.
Questioning the state on the delay in completing the proceedings for departmental action even after 15 months have lapsed, the bench said the state shall not defend such erring officials. It directed the state government to file a status report on the issue of departmental action and adjourned the hearing to Friday.
Officer was suspended & booked in criminal case
AAG J Ravindran informed the bench that compensation was paid to the victim as per the directions of a division bench. Referring to the action against the erring police official, he said the officer was placed under suspension and a criminal case was registered for violation of the procedures. However, the bench said suspension is not a punishment but departmental action should have been taken
Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp
Download the TNIE app to stay with us and follow the latest
Advertisement
violation of Pocso Act
Advertisement
Related Stories
Image used for representational purposes only.
Fisherman gets 20-year jail term in Thane for sexually assaulting minor on false promise of marriage
PTI
14 Jan 2026
The victim and her sister have filed affidavits stating “no objection to the grant of bail” and no fears of threat.
Delhi court grants bail in POCSO case after consensual elopement
PTI
12 Jan 2026
A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi.
SC cancels bail of POCSO accused; says likelihood of evidence tampering, influencing witnesses legitimate concerns
Suchitra Kalyan Mohanty
09 Jan 2026
Madras High Court
Madras HC upholds life sentence for mom, partner for sexual assault against child
R Sivakumar
28 Dec 2025
Advertisement
TNIE Logo white
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
About Us
Terms Of Use
The Morning Standard
Dinamani
Kannada Prabha
Samakalika Malayalam
Cinema Express
Indulgexpress
Edex Live
E-PAPER
Copyright – newindianexpress.com 2026. All rights reserved.
Powered by Quintype
[30/01, 10:39] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has expressed strong disapproval of the Tamil Nadu government’s handling of a sexual assault case involving a 10-year-old girl in Anna Nagar, Chennai. The court criticized the police for violating the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and directed the state government to file a status report on departmental action taken against the erring police officials.
The case involves allegations of police misconduct, including failure to follow proper procedures and disclosure of the victim’s identity. The court emphasized that suspension is not enough and departmental action must be initiated against the officials responsible. ¹ ² ³
Would you like to know more about the POCSO Act or the court’s stance on police accountability in such cases?
