Follow:
- Next story Mr S Prabakaran, Senior Advocate appearing for Mr Nainar Nagendran through video conferencings submitted that Mr. C. Robert Bruce wilfully and deliberately suppressed the existence of a pending criminal case, arising out of FIR registered in the year 2019. It was contended by Mr S Prabakaran that the said criminal proceedings were not disclosed in the nomination affidavit (Form 26) submitted by the returned candidate on 27.03.2024, in clear violation of Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- Previous story https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-protect-rights-of-women-in-live-in-relationships-519581 [19/01, 19:52] Sekarreporter: The Madras High Court recently stressed on the need to protect the rights of women who are caught up in the “modern web” of live-in relationships. Justice S Srimathy remarked that live-in relationships are a cultural shock to the Indian society but are happening widely
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD).No.4272 of 2026 R.Kanagavel Pandian ….Petitioner Vs 1. The Director General of Police (DGP) Tamil Nadu Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 2. The Commissioner of Police Chennai city police, No.124, EVR Sampath salai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. 3. The Commissioner of Police Madurai City
- Government Can Engage Lawyers Of Its Choice; Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Reservation U/S 34 RPwD Act: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-muthupandi-v-the-secretary-to-government-public-department-2026mhc3189-contract-as-litigants-choice-1619106 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.(MD)No.15422 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD)No.11560 of 2026 Laura Frances Iyengar Vs. 1.TN HR and CE Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam West, Chennai-34. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. 3.Sri Arulmighu Abishta Varatharajaperumal Temple
- [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: Today, during the hearing of a case related to NGT ban on construction on 1 km zone around Pallikaranai marshland before #MadrasHighCourt, Senior Counsel P.S. Raman argued for CREDAI Chennai and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran represented G-Square. After Mr. Raman argued at length, Senior Counsel J. Ravindran: I will adopt the arguments of Mr. Raman and also his professional fees MiLords [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Bail granted /HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No. 16216 of 2026 G.V.Markandayan S/o.Late.G.Varatharajan, Member of Legislative Assembly (Vilathikulam Constituency),
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD).No.4272 of 2026 R.Kanagavel Pandian ….Petitioner Vs 1. The Director General of Police (DGP) Tamil Nadu Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 2. The Commissioner of Police Chennai city police, No.124, EVR Sampath salai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. 3. The Commissioner of Police Madurai City
- Government Can Engage Lawyers Of Its Choice; Cannot Be Compelled To Provide Reservation U/S 34 RPwD Act: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-muthupandi-v-the-secretary-to-government-public-department-2026mhc3189-contract-as-litigants-choice-1619106 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.(MD)No.15422 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD)No.11560 of 2026 Laura Frances Iyengar Vs. 1.TN HR and CE Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam West, Chennai-34. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. 3.Sri Arulmighu Abishta Varatharajaperumal Temple
- [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: Today, during the hearing of a case related to NGT ban on construction on 1 km zone around Pallikaranai marshland before #MadrasHighCourt, Senior Counsel P.S. Raman argued for CREDAI Chennai and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran represented G-Square. After Mr. Raman argued at length, Senior Counsel J. Ravindran: I will adopt the arguments of Mr. Raman and also his professional fees MiLords [03/08, 19:49] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Bail granted /HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No. 16216 of 2026 G.V.Markandayan S/o.Late.G.Varatharajan, Member of Legislative Assembly (Vilathikulam Constituency),