![[Breaking] Students vs UGC : SC To Pronounce Judgment Tomorrow On Pleas Against Final Semester Exams https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/breaking-students-vs-ugc-sc-to-pronounce-judgment-tomorrow-on-pleas-against-final-semester-exams-162056](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter: https://x.com/i/status/2010947817825862065 [13/01, 11:12] Meta AI: I tried accessing the link, but it seems it’s not working for me 😅. Maybe try searching for the content or keywords? Hope you find what you’re looking for! 😊 Need help with anything else? [13/01, 11:12] Sekarreporter: #Breaking Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on the challenge to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Justice BV Nagarathna has struck down the provision, while Justice KV Viswanathan has upheld it, holding that corruption complaints against public servants must first undergo Lokpal vetting #SupremeCourt [13/01, 11:12] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has delivered a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with Justice BV Nagarathna declaring the provision unconstitutional and Justice KV Viswanathan upholding it, stating that corruption complaints against public servants must undergo Lokpal vetting. ¹ Justice Nagarathna argued that Section 17A protects corrupt officials, while Justice Viswanathan emphasized that an independent agency, free from executive influence, should decide on sanction for investigation. He directed that the sanction must be decided by the Lok Pal or Lokayukta, effectively reading down Section 17A to ensure constitutional validity. This verdict stems from a writ petition challenging the 2018 amendment to the Prevention of Corruption Act, which mandates prior government sanction for investigating public servants. The outcome may impact how corruption cases are handled, balancing protection for honest officials and accountability for corrupt practices.
- Previous story #JanaNayagan UPDATE: No mention is made before Chief Justice of India Surya Kant’s bench in the Supreme Court regarding #JanaNayagan SLP. The Bench begins hearing regular cases for the day.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
- Vinothpandian: 2006 (4) SCC 538 : union of india vs Munshi Ram ; mistake on orders of court , cannot be allowed to retain the same benefit when the benefit given to Said others was reduced by order of court
- [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx_oMflZJPFrOovujF03ZR6jbEnzOM5MId?si=z0ymYd4X_Px8P0XB [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: *How an actress won ₹10 lakh from Sun TV for Veerappan’s remarks: 30-year case ends in Madras HC* During the interview, Veerappan had made certain claims about Sukanya’s alleged relationship with former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao’s son. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/how-an-actress-won-10-lakh-from-sun-tv-for-veerappans-remarks-30-year-case-ends-in-madras-hc
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
- Vinothpandian: 2006 (4) SCC 538 : union of india vs Munshi Ram ; mistake on orders of court , cannot be allowed to retain the same benefit when the benefit given to Said others was reduced by order of court
- [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx_oMflZJPFrOovujF03ZR6jbEnzOM5MId?si=z0ymYd4X_Px8P0XB [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: *How an actress won ₹10 lakh from Sun TV for Veerappan’s remarks: 30-year case ends in Madras HC* During the interview, Veerappan had made certain claims about Sukanya’s alleged relationship with former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao’s son. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/how-an-actress-won-10-lakh-from-sun-tv-for-veerappans-remarks-30-year-case-ends-in-madras-hc