Vinothpandian: Madras High court : Kasirajan vs P senthil vinayagam CMA 936 of 2015 dated 6th January 2026 : motor vehicles tribunal was duty bound to render substantial justice rather than deny relief on technical grounds [12/01, 12:49] Vinothpandian:

[12/01, 12:49] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : Kasirajan vs P senthil vinayagam CMA 936 of 2015 dated 6th January 2026 : motor vehicles tribunal was duty bound to render substantial justice rather than deny relief on technical grounds
[12/01, 12:49] Vinothpandian: 2025(3) CTC 95 ( DB ) Thalapathy Ramkumar vs P Arjunan : Parents need not be senior citizens aged 60 years or more for entitlement of maintenance under section 4 of maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act 2007
[12/01, 12:49] Vinothpandian: 2025 (2) CTC 449 : Indo pacific software vs kone elevators: Held defence or claim not raised before arbitrator cannot be considered by courts ( section34 arbitration and coincilation act )
[12/01, 12:49] Vinothpandian: 2025 (2) CTC 864 SC ; Om prakash gupta vs satish chandra : counsel who learns of party’s death , duty bound to inform court , stray or oblique mention of death without date or formal notice does not constitute sufficient compliance with rules ( order 22 rule 10 A CPC 1908 )

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com