4.1 The plaintiff was named after one of martyrs of the anti-Hindi agitation, viz., M.Rasendran. On account of his deep love for the Tamil language, the plaintiff authored the script CHEMMOZHI and registered the same with the fifth defendant on 27.01.2010; 4.5 4.5 While the plaintiff has set out the details of the script in the plaint at paragraph No.14 thereof, the counter affidavits of the first and fourth defendants do not contain a substantive denial thereof.

[02/01, 20:21] Sekarreporter: 4.1

4.1 The plaintiff was named after one of martyrs of the anti-Hindi agitation, viz., M.Rasendran. On account of his deep love for the Tamil language, the plaintiff authored the script CHEMMOZHI and registered the same with the fifth defendant on 27.01.2010;

4.5

4.5 While the plaintiff has set out the details of the script in the plaint at paragraph No.14 thereof, the counter affidavits of the first and fourth defendants do not contain a substantive denial thereof.

9.

9. At paragraph No.14 of the plaint, the plaintiff has set out the sum and substance of the script. The first defendant has asserted in the counter affidavit at paragraph No.24 that the story was registered on 11.03.2020 with the fifth defendant. A copy of the story is, however, unavailable at present. The screen play is also unavailable at present.

10.

10. On the basis of materials placed on record by the parties, at this juncture, it is not possible to even reach a prima facie finding that copyright infringement has taken place.

11.2 A. No.6458 of 2025 is disposed of by
directing the fifth defendant to submit a report, as
directed earlier, in a sealed envelope. The relevance,
materiality and weight to be accorded thereto shall
be determined in course of final disposal.
[02/01, 20:21] Sekarreporter: 🙏