நிஷா பானு நீதிபதி issue

You may also like...

• 

  Prabhu Thilaak Recent news reports have once again brought to the fore the urgent need to re-examine our approach to gender justice and judicial accountability. In particular, two young men — technology professionals — who took their own lives have raised serious questions. Both were reportedly driven to despair by the weight of judicial proceedings in matrimonial disputes, where maintenance orders were imposed without due consideration of the broader circumstances.

  October 7, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 7, 2025

• 

  Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* W.P.Nos.15215 & 15222 of 2022 – *Judge:* KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioner: MRF Ltd – Respondents: 1. Additional Director DGGI, Delhi Zonal Unit, 2. Additional / Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Chennai South Commissionerate – *Date of Order:* 28.11.2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Mr.V.Lakshmikumaran, assisted by Ms.R.Charulatha, Mr.Raghav Rajeev, Mr.Nirmal Ali, and Mr.Sagarika Shankar – For Respondent: Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, ASG, assisted by Mr.Rajinish Pathiyil, SPC for R1, and Mr.K.Mohanamurali, SPC for R2 – *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court quashed the show cause notice dated 07.04.2022 issued by the 1st respondent, holding that the petitioner’s payment of tax dues, along with interest, was made in accordance with the GST Act. The court allowed the writ petitions, observing that the petitioner’s communication dated 07.01.2019, treating the supply of TTF as a “composite supply”, was valid, and the subsequent payment made on 21.02.2019 was a voluntary payment.

  December 4, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 4, 2025

• 

  Supreme Court Allows Two Judicial Officers In Uttarakhand To Join Delhi Judicial Service, Says HC’s Denial Of Permission Violates Rights |@mittal_mtn #SupremeCourt

  January 20, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 20, 2026