Court Observation:* The court is considering appeals against the writ order dated 18.07.2019 passed in WP.No.34395 of 2007, challenging a Government order related to OSR (Open Space Reservation) lands in a layout developed by Peelamedu Industrial
[02/12, 12:08] Sekarreporter: *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS*
*WA No. 676 of 2020 AND WA NO. 3115 OF 2019*
*Date of Order:* 18-11-2025
*Coram:*
- HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
- HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
*Parties:*
- *Appellants:* R.Sudha, K.Ramasamy, A.Vimala, A.Gopalan, N.Lakshmi Bai, R.Vimala, R.Gokilammal (WA No. 676 of 2020)
- *Respondents:* K.Durairaj (died), The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Town Administrative And Water Supply Department, and others
- *Appellants:* S.Madhan, P.G.Alexander (died), R. Sateesh Kumar, and others (WA No. 3115 of 2019)
- *Respondents:* K.Durairaj (died), The Secretary To Government, Tamil Nadu Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, and others
*Counsel:*
- *For Appellants (WA No. 676 of 2020):* Mr.S.Venkatesh S.
- *For Respondents:* Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, Special Government Pleader, and others
- *For Appellants (WA No. 3115 of 2019):* Mr.Avinash Wadhwani
- *For Respondents:* Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, Special Government Pleader, and others
*Court Observation:*
The court is considering appeals against the writ order dated 18.07.2019 passed in WP.No.34395 of 2007, challenging a Government order related to OSR (Open Space Reservation) lands in a layout developed by Peelamedu Industrial Worker’s Co-operative House Construction Society Ltd. The dispute involves allegations of irregularities in the development and sale of common areas and OSR lands by the Co-operative Society.
[02/12, 12:08] Sekarreporter: 👍
![[11/18, 08:32] Sekarreporter 1: Is Tying a Rakhi or Marrying the Sexual Assaulter Justice for the Victim? https://www.newsclick.in/is-tying-rakhi-marrying-sexual-assaulter-justice-victim [11/18, 08:32] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court judgment referred to earlier, notes that “the petitioner is ready and willing to marry the victim girl”. It also records that the survivor in her statement has admitted to being in love. Yet, there is no mention of whether she is willing to marry him. Moreover, can she make a decision about getting married as a minor? The court has instead laid a bail condition that the parents must file joint affidavits with their ‘consent’ to this marriage. There is no direction of what is to happen if the girl’s parents decline to file such an affidavit. Will his bail stand cancelled if the parents refuse to get their pregnant daughter married? Or will his bail stand retrospectively cancelled if the girl refuses to marry when she turns 18?](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)