2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances

[07/11, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances
[07/11, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 241 : chinnathambi @ subramani vs state , tiruppur district : filing of report that crime is undetectable cannot be construed that investigation has been completed , report of police about undetectable crime does not terminate investigation ( sec 173 ( 2) CRPC 1973 )
[07/11, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2019( 6) CTC 670 : Boomadevi B vs district collector kanchipuram : judgement be passed in case of specific performance even if passed exparte , decree passed on basis of false and frivolous suit is nullity
[07/11, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) SCC 135 : Rajinder kumar & others vs shri kuldeep singh : order 8 rule 10 CPC 1908 : held exparte decree is a valid decree for all purposes
[07/11, 10:35] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 179 : saraswat co- operative bank ltd vs state of maharastra : Bank sought possession of secured assets , collector did not take action merely on ground of pendency of suit , collector bound to follow principles of law , cannot enter upon an adjudication of merits of claim of bank , exercise of powers by collector under sec 14 of SARFASI act explained