Follow:
- Next story Justice L Victoria Gowri of the Madurai bench restored the conviction of the husband under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, and his imprisonment for six months. In an order passed on October 31, justice Gowri held that acts such as isolating the wife, denying her food, obstructing her religious practices, and coercing her to bring money from her relatives amounted to “grave mental cruelty”.
- Previous story மக்கள் பணம் ஐகோர்ட் அதிர்ச்சியாக உள்ளது தலைமை நீதிபதி சரமாரி கேள்வி
Recent Posts
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station
- Elephant case order THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No. 31555 of 20 23 AND W.M.P.No.32894 of 2023 Mr. Alok Aswani Gupta S/o. Ashwani Gupta 235, Mazal Waddo, Assagao, Bardez, North Goa – 403507 Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief
More
Recent Posts
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station
- Elephant case order THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No. 31555 of 20 23 AND W.M.P.No.32894 of 2023 Mr. Alok Aswani Gupta S/o. Ashwani Gupta 235, Mazal Waddo, Assagao, Bardez, North Goa – 403507 Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief