Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea alleging discrepancies NEET-PG results. Court: We don’t approve this practice of students just coming into Supreme Court (with) Article 32 (petitions, saying) “declare this and that, this is discrepancy, this is error.” Sorry sir.

You may also like...

• 

  Sekhar sir. Very shortly 8 – 10 Addl.Judges will be appointed to Our Chennai High Court.

  May 6, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 6, 2020

• 

  The Division bench in its interim order dated 1.9.2022 suspended the order of single judge. The orders which were reserved after hearing arguments were pronounced on 28.9.2022 allowing Writ appeals of TNERC and State Govt and dismissed the Writ appeal preferred by Writ Petitioner P. Wilson appeared for Appellants(TNERC and State Govt ) Mr Sri Charan and Mr Isaac Mohanlal appeared for Respondents ( TN Spinning Mills Assn)

  October 2, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 2, 2022

• 

  Vinothpandian mhc advt law tips supreme 65 : manoharan vs state by inspector of police , variety hall police station coimbatore : Review can only be on a glaring error apparent on the face of the judgement or order , a mere change or addition of grounds cannot be allowed at the stage of review ( art 137 constitution of india )

  February 9, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 9, 2021