You may also like...
-
[1/3, 12:22] Pandian Mhc: Section 362 CrPC does not bar inherent power of high court To recall An order:SC NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs KRISHNA KUMAR PANDEY 6’Dec’2019 [1/3, 12:55] Sekarreporter: [1/3, 12:22] Pandian Mhc: Section 362 CrPC does not bar inherent power of high court To recall An order:SC NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs KRISHNA KUMAR PANDEY 6’Dec’2019 [1/3, 12:55] Sekarreporter: 👍
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 3, 2020
-
Property law learned I Additional District Judge, Salem in A.S.No.88 of 1986, A.S.No.89 of 1986 and A.S.No.90 of 1986 dated 29.07.1988 in reversing the decree and judgment dated 11.04.1986 passed in O.S.No.236 of 1985, O.S.No.304 of 1985 and O.S.No.305 of 1985 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Sankari is hereby confirmed. Costs throughout. 12-11-2025 nl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1. The I Additional District Judge, Salem 2. The Subordinate Judge, Sankari V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. nl SA No. 1293 of 1988, SA No. 1294 of 1988 & SA No. 1295 of 1988 12-11-2025
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 8, 2026
-
Vinayagar idol.Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran on Monday issued notice returnable in 4 weeks.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 5, 2025