Follow:
- Next story MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench to hear today a PIL filed by Madurai based advocate C Selvakumar seeking a direction to Karur police to alter the FIR & include TVK Vijay’s name in it. This plea was filed in Madurai Bench before SC order and transferred to Chennai only now @THChennai
- Previous story MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 31583 of 2024 AND WMP Nos.34323, 34324 and 34326 of 2024 R.Rajendran … Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by its Chief Secretary, Public (Special-A
Recent Posts
- Batch of Writ Petitions disposed together* **Relief** *Disposed with observations. No costs imposed* *3. What this means* This is a *common disposal order* where HC heard multiple writ petitions together on same issue/facts.
- *Source*: _Sekarreporter.com_ *Next*: *1. “Grounds for Quashing Suspension Order”* OR *2. “Back pay during suspension period – Entitlement?”* OR *3. “Back to Case #194 Sonam Raghuvanshi”*
- 26.In view of the foregoing observations and having regard to the factual and legal position, all the writ petitions stand disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- this Court is of the considered view that such temporary appointments cannot be allowed to continue for an indefinite period, which may give rise to expectations for regularisation. Therefore, the Judicial Department is expected to initiate proactive action to ensure
- the writ petition is allowed and the impugned suspension order dated 03.05.2026 stands quashed. The 3rd respondent is directed to revoke the suspension order of the petitioner and admit him into service forthwith. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-07-2026
More
Recent Posts
- Batch of Writ Petitions disposed together* **Relief** *Disposed with observations. No costs imposed* *3. What this means* This is a *common disposal order* where HC heard multiple writ petitions together on same issue/facts.
- *Source*: _Sekarreporter.com_ *Next*: *1. “Grounds for Quashing Suspension Order”* OR *2. “Back pay during suspension period – Entitlement?”* OR *3. “Back to Case #194 Sonam Raghuvanshi”*
- 26.In view of the foregoing observations and having regard to the factual and legal position, all the writ petitions stand disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- this Court is of the considered view that such temporary appointments cannot be allowed to continue for an indefinite period, which may give rise to expectations for regularisation. Therefore, the Judicial Department is expected to initiate proactive action to ensure
- the writ petition is allowed and the impugned suspension order dated 03.05.2026 stands quashed. The 3rd respondent is directed to revoke the suspension order of the petitioner and admit him into service forthwith. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-07-2026