Tvk advt Arima sundaram / SImay go one include sc retired judges only we ask

[10/10, 12:24] Sekarreporter: Tvk sc case arguments started. Sr. Adv. Gopal Subramanium (for TVK): the petition filed before the HC was for a very limited purpose. That the govt should be directed to frame a protocol for road shows. The AAG appears on behalf of the state. In the order various https://www.sekarreporter.com/tvk-sc-case-arguments-started-sr-adv-gopal-subramanium-for-tvk-the-petition-filed-before-the-hc-was-for-a-very-limited-purpose-that-the-govt-should-be-directed-to-frame-a-protocol-for-road-sho/
[10/10, 12:26] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:25] Sekarreporter: Subramanium: this should have been heard by Madurai bench because Madurai bench already entertained petitions. Counsel appear without any affidavit being called. It’s a stampede. It’s a human tragedy. I agree. But to make observations…
[10/10, 12:25] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:27] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:27] Sekarreporter: Subramanium: all this is incorrect. The man was escorted by the police outside. I am not even made a party. How are all these observations made without giving a chance to explain?

Sundaram: to say all this behind my back. I was forced and taken away by police because my presence there would have aggravated things.

Subramanium: there are so many people who come near the bus. One of them was hit. There is no statement. There is no verification.
[10/10, 12:27] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:29] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:29] Sekarreporter: Justice Maheshwari: in para 3 of the order it is mentioned mr. So and so govt advocate that WP filed before Madurai bench was declined. So this a petition filed in Chennai. The relief was to formulate a SOP. So whether this relief would fall under a criminal WP? It is not about quashing. This is an incident with respect to Karur. Once it is a petition to karur and Madurai bench was taking cognisance so why this was entertained? That too for SOP? Principal bench can take cognisance we are not denying. But we want to understand from you.

Sr. Adv. Aryama Sundaram: in madras Madurai jurisdiction is only Madurai unless the CJ constitutes a special bench.
[10/10, 12:29] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:32] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:31] Sekarreporter: Gopal: as far as we are concerned, mylords my constitute SIT

Aryama: we are a political party, there is bias-to say that SIT will have police officers-we have a problem. A retired judge would be fine. We are not saying there should not be investigation. This political party is gaining power and this, SIT constituted with police officers who made allegations in my absence- I want an impartial investigation.
[10/10, 12:31] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:33] Sekarreporter: Subramanium: your lordships may constitute an SIT. We have complete faith.

Sundaram: only thing we do request, to say that we will have an SIT of the 3 people of police is the state we will have a problem. We need a Retd Supreme Court judge to oversee. Let there be a fair investigation. You appoint a SIT of state officials after PP and AAG have made allegations against me! All we want is an impartial investigation.
[10/10, 12:33] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:33] Sekarreporter: Subramanium: your lordships may constitute an SIT. We have complete faith.

Sundaram: only thing we do request, to say that we will have an SIT of the 3 people of police is the state we will have a problem. We need a Retd Supreme Court judge to oversee. Let there be a fair investigation. You appoint a SIT of state officials after PP and AAG have made allegations against me! All we want is an impartial investigation.
[10/10, 12:33] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter: [10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter: Justice Maheshwari: any other writ petition for formation of SOP was filed?

Sr. Adv. Mukul Rohatgi(for state): yes. By this very party.

Sundaram: that was prior to the incident. Nothing after.
[10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter: .
[10/10, 12:41] Sekarreporter: எங்கள் தரப்பின் விளக்கமே கேட்காமல் உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கருத்துகளை முன்வைத்துள்ளது”

உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் தவெக தரப்பு வாதம்