Follow:
- Next story Re: CMA No. 4375/2019 against MCOP No. 308/2015- Special Sub Court, CBE- Justices M M Sundresh and Krishnan Ramasamy – set aside an award for Rs.1,93,60,000/- with interest and costs, by orders dt.18/2/2020. And Registrar General High Court has been directed to initiate departmental action against the said Judge who passed the award and had also passed several similar awards. Very interesting Judgment which needs to be reported widely in public interest. Please check for orders in Item 26- 6th Court today.
- Previous story FERA case: Crl A No.180/2009 The appeal filed by the department (UOI) vs R Hon’ble Justice M.Dhandapani ed Appeal was allowed setting aside the lower court aqutial order & thereby confirming the conviction of all 6 accused. Ed advt Hema
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o .15620 of 2026 E.Jeyaprabhu S/o Elango Shanmugam, Plot No.19, Bharathi Street, Krishnamoorthy Nagar, K.K.Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 021. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Director Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o .15620 of 2026 E.Jeyaprabhu S/o Elango Shanmugam, Plot No.19, Bharathi Street, Krishnamoorthy Nagar, K.K.Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 021. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Director Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy