Follow:
- Next story [3/2, 09:50] sekarreporter1: Judge Abdul.kuthose [3/2, 09:51] sekarreporter Madras HC Declares Order Invalid Without Considering Assessee Response Madras HC’s Order for M/s.Engineering Aids In a recent instance, the High Court (HC) of Madras ruled that the ruling made in accordance with section 74 of the GST, 2017, without taking the assessee’s response into account, is invalid.
- Previous story [3/2, 07:30] sekarreporter1: Judge kumaresh babu directed medical college to refund 10.5 L to a student [3/2, 07:30] sekarreporter1: 🌹
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.
- Ipr case Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, by an order dated April 29, 2026, said the organiser would not be permitted to proceed with the events unless it either paid the amount claimed by IPRS or created a fixed deposit in favour of the registrar general of the high court.
More
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.
- Ipr case Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, by an order dated April 29, 2026, said the organiser would not be permitted to proceed with the events unless it either paid the amount claimed by IPRS or created a fixed deposit in favour of the registrar general of the high court.