Follow:
- Next story One other reason I would lay emphasis to direct the petitioner to approach the District Court is that, if this Court set asides the order impugned in this writ petition and remits the matter back to the 3rd respondent, the 3rd respondent will take his own time to pass an order and thereafter, the petitioner will have to approach the District Court under Section 16(3). The time that the respondent would take to dispose of the claim of the petitioner would also be utilised before the jurisdictional forum. When the petitioner approaches the District Court, the concerned District Judge shall also take into consideration the guidelines issued by the Central Government dated 15.10.2015, for awarding a just compensation and I hope such application shall be disposed of by the District Judge, as expeditiously as possible. 35. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.02.2023 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn To 1.The Power Grid Corporation of India, 62, Ground Floor, Thilak Nagar, Tirunelveli-1, Rep by its Chief Manager. 2.The Executive Engineer (Distribution) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tirunelveli. 3.The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector of Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli. K.KUMARESH BABU, J. sbn W.P.(MD)No.6528 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 22.02.2023 shall also take into consideration the guidelines issued by the Central Government dated 15.10.2015, for awarding a just compensation and I hope such application shall be disposed of by the District Judge, as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.02.2023 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn To 1.The Power Grid Corporation of India, 62, Ground Floor, Thilak Nagar, Tirunelveli-1, Rep by its Chief Manager. 2.The Executive Engineer (Distribution) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tirunelveli. 3.The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector of Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli. K.KUMARESH BABU, J. sbn W.P.(MD)No.6528 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 22.02.2023
- Previous story Srimathi Advt Mhc: It was indeed . The Chief narrated so many incidents, experiences ranging from his personal interactions with seniors at the Bar and what he had read and heard. It was indeed a very interesting, illuminating speech. Many have heard of Sri. Nani Palkivala the Chief’s reference
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
More
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
