You may also like...
-
[11/29, 20:33] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1333063677851799552?s=08 [11/29, 20:33] Sekarreporter1: Madras HC appoints advocate commissioner over plea seeking to prevent illegal sand mining – https://t.co/d0z8Qhwx1K Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://t.co/d5lhnPTWZ0 https://t.co/1nxvn3mwKO
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 29, 2020
-
The Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with the finding of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court regarding the deemed demand concession withdrawal by TNERC since 2013. The batch of Special Leave Petitions filed by the HT Open Access Consumers challenged the Division Bench order of the Hon’ble Madras High Court, which upheld the circular issued by TANGEDCO authorising the issuance of demand notices in accordance with the Tariff Order dated 10.06.2013 issued by TNERC, which did not consider a deemed demand.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 10, 2026
-
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 112 – Declaration of ownership of property – Defendants have denied that the plaintiff is their brother or the son of their parents – High Court directed the plaintiff to undergo the DNA test – Appeal against – DNA test is not to be directed as a matter of routine but only in deserving cases – When the plaintiff is unwilling to subject himself to the DNA test, forcing him to undergo one would impinge on his personal liberty and his right to privacy – Respondent cannot compel the plaintiff to adduce further evidence in support of the defendants’ case – In any case, it is the burden on a litigating party to prove his case adducing evidence in support of his plea and the court should not compel the party to prove his case in the manner, suggested by the contesting party – Impugned judgment merits interference and is set aside – Appeal allowed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 18, 2021