You may also like...
-
![[02/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against RSS Members Booked For 100th Year Vijayadasami Celebration Without Permission https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-jayapal-v-the-state-crl-op-no-10849-of-2026-rss-members-booked-on-vijayadasami-during-100-year-celebration-1615159 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media [02/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: ..](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[02/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against RSS Members Booked For 100th Year Vijayadasami Celebration Without Permission https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/v-jayapal-v-the-state-crl-op-no-10849-of-2026-rss-members-booked-on-vijayadasami-during-100-year-celebration-1615159 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media [02/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: ..
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 2, 2026
-
considering the genuine and resonable request of senior advocate s. Prabakaran, the Honble Division bench has directed the state government to consider the request of the grievance of the theatre owners by increasing the price of tickets. The Honble Division bench further directed the association to maintain social distancing and follow sop. The division bench disposed the writ with directions.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 12, 2021
-
W.A.No.177 of 2021 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (Order of the court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated —–) under what authority the impugned order was passed by the then Revenue Divisional Officer, when the said authority is only an appellate authority and the power only vests with the Tahsildhar, as per Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983. (ii) The reason for not summoning the Company for enquiry, when the first respondent-Company had sent a letter to the Revenue Divisional Officer asserting their ownership much before the impugned order effecting name change in patta was issued. (iii) when and where all the original files were placed/misplaced, since the then RDO asserted that on the date when he passed the order impugned in the writ petition, they were very much available ; and (iv) the further course of action that is proposed to be taken against the errant officials in this regard.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 22, 2021