![[11/18, 11:11] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1328936311898710019?s=08 [11/18, 11:11] Sekarreporter 1: The stand of UGC is very clear that arrear examinations cannot be cancelled, it’s counsel V. Sudha tells Madras HC. Urges the court to list on Friday all connected cases against TN Govt’s decision to cancel the examinations. Msnj benxh https://t.co/rSLgeOKG7z](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [6/28, 08:44] Sekarreporter: HC orders posting for jail warder candidate – http://toi.in/9T3uCa47/a31ga8 Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare [6/28, 08:46] Sekarreporter: 💐
- Previous story Criticising Bar Council decision, motivated comment against judges ground for disqualification of lawyers: BCI amends Rules As per the amendments, a lawyer shall not be permitted to publish anything or to make any statement or press-release in media against any resolution or order of a State Bar Council or Bar Council of India.
Recent Posts
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
More
Recent Posts
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
