Follow:
- Next story GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *CRL.A. 258/2019* Maruthupandi Vs. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police Dated: 30.04.2021 *Hon’ble Justice P. Velmurugan* dismissed the Criminal Appeal in the matter of *“POCSO”* while observing that *“compromise in sexual offences trivializes the trauma of the victim”* and further held the following:
- Previous story 18:27] Sathyam Advt Delhil: Media Note Cases Listed On – 28-05-2021 :1.A ,CT-74,B1 BId-5145,Sl-11,WPIL-831 of 2021,Apl-2/2021 : – Allahabad High Court Lawyer ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA filed a PIL in Allahabad high Court through Advocate Satyam Singh Rajput against use of public address systems is going on in the entire state at the Mosques and other religious places.
Recent Posts
- Justice M Nirmal Kumar, the prosecution sought time to file its response. Accepting the request, the court granted the prosecution time to file a status report. The court also asked the prosecution
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.Crl.No.1246 of 2026 V.Palaniappan ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Corporation, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Parktown, Chennai 600 007. ..Respondent
- MADRAS HIGH COURT DIRECTS POLICE ENQUIRY INTO COMPLAINTS RELATING TO CHETTINAD VIDYASHRAM AND ASSOCIATED TRUSTS.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl. A(MD)Nos.973, 1094 of 2023 and 642 of 2024 Crl.A.(MD) No.973 of 2023 Muthukumar : Appellant(s)/ A3 Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thaadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 264 of
- [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: Justice M. Dhandapani of #MadrasHighCourt on Monday closed a 2016 writ petition filed by DMK regarding conduct of local body polls in Tamil Nadu. Justice N. Kirubakaran (since retired) had passed elaborate orders in that case and said: “Invariably, many persons who contest the local body elections are chosen by the political parties based on their affluence and muscle power and they are also found to be persons with criminal antecedents.” @THChennai [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: ..
More
Recent Posts
- Justice M Nirmal Kumar, the prosecution sought time to file its response. Accepting the request, the court granted the prosecution time to file a status report. The court also asked the prosecution
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.Crl.No.1246 of 2026 V.Palaniappan ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Corporation, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Parktown, Chennai 600 007. ..Respondent
- MADRAS HIGH COURT DIRECTS POLICE ENQUIRY INTO COMPLAINTS RELATING TO CHETTINAD VIDYASHRAM AND ASSOCIATED TRUSTS.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl. A(MD)Nos.973, 1094 of 2023 and 642 of 2024 Crl.A.(MD) No.973 of 2023 Muthukumar : Appellant(s)/ A3 Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thaadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 264 of
- [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: Justice M. Dhandapani of #MadrasHighCourt on Monday closed a 2016 writ petition filed by DMK regarding conduct of local body polls in Tamil Nadu. Justice N. Kirubakaran (since retired) had passed elaborate orders in that case and said: “Invariably, many persons who contest the local body elections are chosen by the political parties based on their affluence and muscle power and they are also found to be persons with criminal antecedents.” @THChennai [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: ..