You may also like...
-
Conclusion: 48. In view of the facts and circumstances and the legal position as considered in the aforementioned paragraphs, writ orders impugned are not in consonance with the principles settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and on facts. Consequently, writ orders dated 09.01.2015 in W.P.No.26856 of 2010 and W.P.No.19724 of 2005 and writ orders dated 24.01.2011 in W.P.No.17867 of 2010 and W.P. No.20769 of 2010 are set aside. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.854 and 1645 of 2015 are allowed and Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.1549 and 1550 of 2015 and 1529 and 1530 of 2018 are dismissed. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [S.M.S., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 11.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi/Jeni To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition III),
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 6, 2025
-
Ms. Geeta Ramaseshan, Advocate,zoom meeting
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 30, 2020
-
Justice S M Subramaniam, judge of the Madras High Court, has written a letter to the Chief Justice of the HC, seeking to initiate criminal contempt action against Tamil actor Suriya over his remarks about judges in the context of the courts allowing the conduct of NEET exam amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 14, 2020