Follow:
- Next story W.M.P.Nos.2074, 2076 and 2077 of 2021 in W.P.Nos.20397, 20398 and 20401 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.6978 of 2021 in W.P.(MD) No.18535 of 2020 and W.P.Nos.17947, 19114, 1516, 18261, 18829, 19049, 19137, 19180, 19190, 19053, 17637, 20007 of 2020, 3653, 729, 1197, 1205, 1470, 2699, 2705, 2932, 3182, 3700, 4933, 4954 of 2021, W.P.(MD) Nos. 17163, 17174 to 17176, 17177, 17178, 17167, 17168, 17170, 17164, 17165, 17171 to 17173, 17179, 17181, 17624, 17625, 17649, 18107, 18109, 18552, 18561, 18564, 18566, 18568, 18555, 18558, 18571, 18758, 18956, 19606 of 2020, 54, 60, 56, 63, 64 and 67 of 2021 Reserved on Pronounced on 01.04.2021 19.04.2021 Petitioner Respondent THE ASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NAD U HIGHWAYS ENGINEERS, REP. BY GENERAL SECRETARY, NO.35V, TALUK OFFICE ROAD, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI 600 015 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI 600 009 Petitioner Counsel Respondent Counsel Prayer (W.P.No.20397/2020): calling for the records of the respondent in G.O.Ms.No. 404 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 12.11.2020 and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to grant revision of pay scale in terms of G.O. Ms.No. 283, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26.08.2010 based on the pay scale presently drawn by the petitioner together with all consequential benefits flowing there from Prayer (W.M.P.No.2074/2021): To vacate the interim stay granted on 30.12.2020 made in WMP.Nos.25167 and 25168 of 2020 in W.P.No. 20397 of 2020. S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., The following Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed, seeking to vacate the interim orders passed by this Court on 14.12.2020 and 30.12.2020: Sl.No. W.M.P.No. Prayer 1. W.M.P.No.2074 of 2021 in W.P.No.20397 of 2020 To vacate the interim stay granted on 30.12.2020 made in W.M.P.Nos.25167 and 25168 of 2020 in W.P.No.20397 of 2020. 2. W.M.P.No.2076 of 2021 in W.P.No.20398 of 2020 To vacate the interim stay granted on 30.12.2020 made in W.M.P.No.25172 of 2020 in W.P.No.20398 of 2020. 3. W.M.P.No.2077 of 2021 in W.P.No.20401 of 2020 To vacate the interim stay granted on 30.12.2020 made in W.M.P.No.25177 to 25179 of 2020 in W.P.No.20401 of 2020. 4. W.M.P.No.6978 of 2021 in W.P.(MD) No.18535 of 2020 To vacate the interim stay granted on 14.12.2020 made in W.M.P.(MD) No.15503 of 2020 in W.P.(MD) No.18535 of 2020. 2. This Court passed the aforesaid interim orders, restraining the Government from reducing the pay band, pertaining to certain Departments, in respect of which Writ Petitions have been filed. This Court also directed the Government to continue to pay the existing pay that were adopted earlier.
- Previous story Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
More
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
