![9/22, 07:57] Sekarreporter1: [9/22, 07:56] Sekarreporter1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *V. Anusha Vs. B. Krishnan* A.Nos. 335 & 703 of 2021 and A.No.2011 of 2021 in O.P.No.443 of 2021 Dated: 16.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* disposed the Applications in the Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Children – Custody](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The decisions were taken by the court’s Administrative Committee, comprising Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justices R. Subbiah, M. Sathyanarayanan, N. Kirubakaran, M.M. Sundresh, T.S. Sivagnanam and M. Duraiswamy.
- Previous story Justice N Anand Venkatesh quashed the FIR on applying Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which exempts acts causing slight harm from criminal liability. In doing so, the Judge also opined that while the State may establish TASMAC shops as a matter of policy, people have equal rights to oppose the same.
Recent Posts
- ⚖️ *Advance Ruling Not Maintainable on Issues Already Pending in GST Proceedings: AAR* 📌 *Must Read | GST Case Law* 🔗 *Read Full Article:* https://taxreply.com/x/1862 📚 GST Library by *TaxReply India Pvt. Ltd.*
- Madras High Court Directs State To Consider “SINGAPEN Sensitisation Workshop” For Trauma-Sensitive Implementation Of POCSO Act https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/mikavel-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-ors-and-connected-matters-2026-pocso-1615293 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- R deva Makkal Kural: நீதித்துறையில் AI பயன்பாடு – புதிய வரைவு விதிகளை வெளியிட்டது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்!
- Today Vinothpandian: 2011 (8) SCC 679 : Bakshi dev raj & another vs sudhir kumar : Held in order to safeguard reputation of counsel and to uphold prestige and dignity of legal profession , it is always desirable to get instructions in writing from the client ( order 3 rule 1 & 4 CPC 1908 ) [04/06, 13:21] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 820 : Kelukutty PM and
- Judge pugalenthi orderOne TNSTC bus shown as three, fake records made to swindle money: Madras HC orders vigilance probe | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/one-tnstc-bus-shown-as-three-fake-records-made-to-swindle-money-madras-hc-orders-vigilance-probe
More
Recent Posts
- ⚖️ *Advance Ruling Not Maintainable on Issues Already Pending in GST Proceedings: AAR* 📌 *Must Read | GST Case Law* 🔗 *Read Full Article:* https://taxreply.com/x/1862 📚 GST Library by *TaxReply India Pvt. Ltd.*
- Madras High Court Directs State To Consider “SINGAPEN Sensitisation Workshop” For Trauma-Sensitive Implementation Of POCSO Act https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/mikavel-v-state-of-tamil-nadu-ors-and-connected-matters-2026-pocso-1615293 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- R deva Makkal Kural: நீதித்துறையில் AI பயன்பாடு – புதிய வரைவு விதிகளை வெளியிட்டது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்!
- Today Vinothpandian: 2011 (8) SCC 679 : Bakshi dev raj & another vs sudhir kumar : Held in order to safeguard reputation of counsel and to uphold prestige and dignity of legal profession , it is always desirable to get instructions in writing from the client ( order 3 rule 1 & 4 CPC 1908 ) [04/06, 13:21] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 820 : Kelukutty PM and
- Judge pugalenthi orderOne TNSTC bus shown as three, fake records made to swindle money: Madras HC orders vigilance probe | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/one-tnstc-bus-shown-as-three-fake-records-made-to-swindle-money-madras-hc-orders-vigilance-probe