Follow:
- Next story [4/15, 14:46] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1382594827510976514?s=08 [4/15, 14:47] Sekarreporter1: UGC submitted that “with the suggested modes in this respondents guidelines to evaluate the students and the academic calender of the UGC , the State is to decide on conducive dates, exercising any of the options given in the UGC guidelines, , while keeping in mind the surge in covid cases, for conduct of examinations of all backlog papers of all UG AND PG programmes in consultation with the UGC, which is per the orders of the Apex Court.” [4/15, 14:47] Sekarreporter1: V Sudha Counsel for UGC Central Govt. counsel
- Previous story BREAKING – Collegium Recommendations Pending With Centre For Over 6 Months Will Be Decided Within 3 Months, AG Tells Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/collegium-recommendations-pending-over-6-months-decided-within-3-months-ag-tells-supreme-court-172607
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
- Legal Representative Of Deceased Party Can Challenge Arbitral Award U/S.34 Arbitration Act and not under Article 227 of the Constitution/Section 115 of the CPC.” Supreme Court [22/04, 15:26] sekarreporter1: 2026 INSC 393 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No……………………. OF 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16162/2023) V.K. JOHN … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. MUKANCHAND BOTHRA AND HUF (DIED) REPRESENTED BY LRS. & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T SANJAY KAROL,J.
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan adjourn to June 2026 a writ appeal filed by Murasoli Trust in 2024 against Justice S.M. Subramaniam’s refusal to forbear the National Commission for Scheduled Castes from inquiring into a complaint of the trust being in occupation of 12 grounds of Panchami land in Chennai. @THChennai
- HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.13733 of 2026 and WMP N o .15001 of 2026 A.Mohandoss, Advocate
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
- Legal Representative Of Deceased Party Can Challenge Arbitral Award U/S.34 Arbitration Act and not under Article 227 of the Constitution/Section 115 of the CPC.” Supreme Court [22/04, 15:26] sekarreporter1: 2026 INSC 393 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No……………………. OF 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16162/2023) V.K. JOHN … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. MUKANCHAND BOTHRA AND HUF (DIED) REPRESENTED BY LRS. & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T SANJAY KAROL,J.
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan adjourn to June 2026 a writ appeal filed by Murasoli Trust in 2024 against Justice S.M. Subramaniam’s refusal to forbear the National Commission for Scheduled Castes from inquiring into a complaint of the trust being in occupation of 12 grounds of Panchami land in Chennai. @THChennai
- HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.13733 of 2026 and WMP N o .15001 of 2026 A.Mohandoss, Advocate