Supreme court : medical council of india vs Anchal Parihar civil appeal no 309/ 2021 dated 2- 02- 2021 : Regulation 6(2) provides that migration is permissible only if both medical colleges are recognized under section 11(2) of indian medical councils act 1956

[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : kridhan infrastructure pvt ltd vs Venkatesan sankaranaryanan civil appeal no 3299 of 2020 dated 1- 03- 2021 : Time is crucial facet of scheme under IBC , to allow such proceedings to lapse into indefinite delay will plainly defeat object of statute
[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: 2019 (266) DLT 305 : university of delhi vs union of india : In a condonation of delay application , a liberal approach should be taken , however condonation of long delay should not be automatic , therefore routine explanation not enough , sufficient cause has to be shown to justify the delay
[3/11, 10:11] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : nawal kishore Sharma vs union of india and others civil appeal no 150 of 2021 dated 10- 02- 2021 : Heart ailment not covered within definition of disability in persons with disabilities act
[3/11, 10:11] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : medical council of india vs Anchal Parihar civil appeal no 309/ 2021 dated 2- 02- 2021 : Regulation 6(2) provides that migration is permissible only if both medical colleges are recognized under section 11(2) of indian medical councils act 1956