![[11/14, 17:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1327585685973258241?s=08 [11/14, 17:44] Sekarreporter 1: [11/14, 06:11] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹 [11/14, 17:38] Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: Hbd Justice G. R. Swaminathan… Let God give him good health, happiness, long life and peace in abundance!](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story ITN Appointment On Preferential Basis Related Bill – Tamil Medium Students Suffering Due To Non Granting Of Governor’s Assent: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/preferential-basis-related-bill-madras-high-court-tn-governor-assent-166884
- Previous story Lambasting the Tamil Nadu government for having ‘overruled’ judicial proceedings and amended police rules to grant accelerated promotion to personnel involved in the killing of forest brigand Veerappan, the Madras high court has quashed the order. “The GO dated July 24, 2013, is an affront on the well settled sacrosanct legal precedents, said Justice V Parthiban, adding, “Either the government was blissfully ignorant as how to exercise its power referable to the Constitution in overruling the judgment of the constitutional court, or it was a cocky demonstration of officious imprudence
Recent Posts
- learned Government Advocate further submitted that to provide better amenities for the pilgrims and ensure effective crowd management, a master plan is under preparation and the same will be submitted by the next hearing. 5. Post these matters on 16.07.2026. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (S.S.,J.)
- [01/08, 16:52] sekarreporter1: இடைத்தேர்தல் தடையை நீக்க கோரி two விஜயபாஸ்கர் ஐகோர்ட்டில் மனு [01/08, 16:52] sekarreporter1: Viralimalai and Karur former MLAs C. Vijayabaskar and M.R. Vijayabhaskar have urged the #MadrasHighCourt to vacate an interim order passed by it on July 10, 2026 restraining Election Commission of India from notifying byelections to these two constituencies along with three others
- Temple order THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Writ Petition Nos. 34810/2023 & 11240/2024 and W.M.P.Nos. 34818/2023 & 12334, 12335/2024 W.P.No.34818 of 2023 A.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government Tourism, Culture and Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai 09. 2. The Secretary to the Government Revenue Department,
- Madras High Court recently held that whistling at a minor girl and pulling her hand when she did not to respond is not sexual assault. The court said that such acts
- From the statements of witnesses and materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioner pulled the vctim by his hand, when the victim failed to respond to his whistle. Such act cannot be straightaway termed as sexual intent and at most, it can be termed as harassment and not an act of sexual assault. Hence, the judgment needs to be re-considered
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
More
Recent Posts
- learned Government Advocate further submitted that to provide better amenities for the pilgrims and ensure effective crowd management, a master plan is under preparation and the same will be submitted by the next hearing. 5. Post these matters on 16.07.2026. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (S.S.,J.)
- [01/08, 16:52] sekarreporter1: இடைத்தேர்தல் தடையை நீக்க கோரி two விஜயபாஸ்கர் ஐகோர்ட்டில் மனு [01/08, 16:52] sekarreporter1: Viralimalai and Karur former MLAs C. Vijayabaskar and M.R. Vijayabhaskar have urged the #MadrasHighCourt to vacate an interim order passed by it on July 10, 2026 restraining Election Commission of India from notifying byelections to these two constituencies along with three others
- Temple order THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Writ Petition Nos. 34810/2023 & 11240/2024 and W.M.P.Nos. 34818/2023 & 12334, 12335/2024 W.P.No.34818 of 2023 A.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government Tourism, Culture and Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai 09. 2. The Secretary to the Government Revenue Department,
- Madras High Court recently held that whistling at a minor girl and pulling her hand when she did not to respond is not sexual assault. The court said that such acts
- From the statements of witnesses and materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioner pulled the vctim by his hand, when the victim failed to respond to his whistle. Such act cannot be straightaway termed as sexual intent and at most, it can be termed as harassment and not an act of sexual assault. Hence, the judgment needs to be re-considered