You may also like...
-
The judgment authored by Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana added : “…we have no hesitation to hold that the prayer for interim bail cannot be normally entertained by this Court in Habeas Corpus Petition, unless and until, it has been made out that intervention of this Court is indispensable at that stage”. “…it is amply clear that this Court while dealing with habeas corpus petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, wherein, the validity of the detention orders are sought to be questioned, has jurisdiction to grant interim bail, but the exercise of the said jurisdiction is inevitably circumscribed by the considerations which are special to such proceedings”, the Court added. Interim Bail In Habeas Petition Challenging Detention Only In Exceptional Circumstances: Madras HC
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 6, 2020
-
திமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ஆ. ராசா மீது 2 பிரிவுகளில் வழக்கு பதிவு அதிமுக வழக்கறிஞர் பிரிவு இணைச் செயலாளர் திருமாறன் மற்றும்
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 12, 2020
-
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.21974 of 2017 and. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel For M/s.Bader Sayeed For R1 to R3 : Mrs.S.Mythreyechandru Special Government Pleader For R4 : No appearance ORDER. In view of the facts and circumstances, it is established that the appointment of the writ petitioner is not in accordance with the rules applicable in the State of Tamil Nadu for appointment to the post of P.G. Assistant. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the order passed by the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 12, 2022
