![[4/27, 09:33] Sekarreporter1: [4/27, 09:32] Sekarreporter1: [4/27, 09:14] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: சேகர், வாட்ச்அப் குழுவினர் பகிர்ந்து கொள்வதற்கு, அட்மின் பொறுப்பு ஆக முடியாது. புதிய உறுப்பினர்களை சேர்ப்பதும், நீக்குவதற்க்கும் தான் அட்மினுக்கு அதிகாரம். சேகர், உனக்கு தணிக்கை, சென்சார் வேலை கிடையாது. சந்துரு சார் கருத்துப்படி தீர்ப்பு வந்து விட்டது. 😁 [4/27, 09:31] Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/27, 09:32] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/yz7uG4lqDUI [4/27, 09:41] Sekarreporter1: [4/27, 09:34] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥பட்டி சார்,ஆனாலும் அறிவிக்கப்படாத துணிக்கைகள் உள்ளன! அதை யாராலும் வெல்ல முடியாது! “Big brothers are watching”. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 [4/27, 09:35] Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/27, 09:45] Sekarreporter1: [4/27, 09:34] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥பட்டி சார்,ஆனாலும் அறிவிக்கப்படாத துணிக்கைகள் உள்ளன! அதை யாராலும் வெல்ல முடியாது! “Big brothers are watching”. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 [4/27, 09:35] Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/27, 09:45] Sekarreporter1: [4/27, 09:36] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, remove ,” only admins can send messages.” [4/27, 09:41] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: சேகர், சந்துரு சார் கருத்தை கவனியுங்கள். தணிக்கை செய்யாதீர்கள். உங்களுக்கு நல்லது. தணிக்கை செய்தால், நீங்கள் தான் பொறுப்பு ஏற்க வேண்டியது வரும். வேண்டாம் தணிக்கை வேலை சேகர். [4/27, 09:42] Sekarreporter1: ☘️](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Idol case IG ponmanikavel reply to govt
- Previous story State orders Idol Wing Special Officer to hand over all records A.G. Pon Manickavel
Recent Posts
- In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS, 2023, is quashed as against the petitioners. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The interim stay already granted stands made absolute. 30.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml To 1. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
- Mmsj rskj pudukotai new court building mmsj excellent speech video
- Judge Victoria Gowri refused to quash because: prosecution has more than just co-accused statement, conscious possession is disputed fact for trial, prima facie case exists, and it doesn’t meet SC’s _Bhajan Lal_ criteria for quashing. So case must go to trial.
- Judge victoriya gowri This Court finds: (a) prosecution is not shown to rest solely on co-accused confession; (b) disputed questions of conscious possession arise; (c) prima facie materials exist requiring trial; (d) case does not fall within State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal20 categories.
- Madurai Bench* *Division Bench*: Justices N. Sathish Kumar & M. Jothiraman — *1. Specific Direction to 14 Collectors*
More
Recent Posts
- In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS, 2023, is quashed as against the petitioners. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The interim stay already granted stands made absolute. 30.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml To 1. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
- Mmsj rskj pudukotai new court building mmsj excellent speech video
- Judge Victoria Gowri refused to quash because: prosecution has more than just co-accused statement, conscious possession is disputed fact for trial, prima facie case exists, and it doesn’t meet SC’s _Bhajan Lal_ criteria for quashing. So case must go to trial.
- Judge victoriya gowri This Court finds: (a) prosecution is not shown to rest solely on co-accused confession; (b) disputed questions of conscious possession arise; (c) prima facie materials exist requiring trial; (d) case does not fall within State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal20 categories.
- Madurai Bench* *Division Bench*: Justices N. Sathish Kumar & M. Jothiraman — *1. Specific Direction to 14 Collectors*