State pp a natarajan interview video

You may also like...

• 

  *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan (Petitioner) vs. The State (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not specified – For Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond to the petition within three weeks regarding the alleged attempt to steal gold and silver sculptures from the Kanchipuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple. The petitioner alleged that temple officials and priests were involved in the attempted theft, and a special investigation team should be formed to probe the matter. The police had initially closed the complaint, stating no theft was found to have occurred.

  December 2, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 2, 2025

• 

  S m subramaniyam judge –Thus, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the findings of the Railway Claims Tribunal in its order dated 14.03.2019 is not in consonance with the provisions of Section 79 of the Railways Act, 1989 and further the appreciation of facts and circumstances, interpretations of the provisions as well as the reasonings are also not in accordance with the established principles of law. Accordingly, the 35/38 [2/21, 17:39] Sekarreporter1: C.M.A.No.3545 of 2019 order impugned is liable to be set aside.

  February 21, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 21, 2021

• 

  High Court of Madras – Principal Seat at Madras Sitting Arrangements – From June 06, 2022 Sl.No. Hon’ble Judges Subject 1. The Hon’ble Chief Justice and N.Mala, J Writ Petitions – Public Interest Litigations (PILs); Writ Petitions or PILs challenging the vires of the Act, Rules or Regulations(except Writ Petitions and PIL relating to GST Act, Rules

  June 3, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 3, 2022