You may also like...
-
Justice R.Suresh Kumar held that as the petitioner educational institution i.e. the university cannot be assessed for demanding any service tax for the services of education provided by them, which includes affiliation or other services provided for the students, faculty as well as the staff of the university.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 9, 2021
-
[12/13, 15:06] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1338055100850323457?s=08 [12/13, 15:06] Sekarreporter1: Lawyer moves HC over delay in constituting NCLAT in Chennai – https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2020/dec/13/lawyer-moves-hc-over-delay-in-constituting-nclat-in-chennai-2235532.html
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 13, 2020
-
Full cooperative order -THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.12706, 12689, 12905, 12979, 13016, 13260, 13311, 13330, 13185, 13225, 13229, 13238, 13251, 13396,— Senior Counsel for Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram W.P.No.12689 of 2021 : Mr.S.R.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Munusamy W.P.Nos.12979 and 13185/2021 : Mr.M.Baskar W.P.Nos.13780, 13787, 13790, 13794, 13788, 13800, 13803, 13805, 13808, 13810, 13814, 13817, 13820, 13822, 13823, 13827, 13834, 13837, 13840, 13829 : Mr.V.Janarthanan of 2021 For Respondents : Mr.P.Shanmugasundaram Advocate General, assisted by Mr.A.Selvendran, Government Advocate COMMON ORDER — Though the petitioners made allegations against the officials of the respondents with regard to interfering and harassing the petitioners without following due process of law, at this stage, the same cannot be gone into by this Court without placing any supporting materials to substantiate these allegations. 15. The learned counsel for the parties have raised the issue/contention with regard to maintainability of the writ petitions. This Court has not gone into the issue with regard to maintainability of the writ petitioners, in view of the statement made by the first respondent in the Status Report. 16. This Court has recorded above, the submission made by the learned Advocate General, based on the Status Report of the first respondent. It is made clear that if any action taken by the respondents is contrary to the procedures as contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Rules, 1988, it is always open to the elected office bearers of the Societies to agitate the same before the appropriate forum. 17. With the above observations, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 5, 2021
