![/13, 08:19] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1337952696888942593?s=08 [12/13, 08:19] Sekarreporter1: [12/13, 06:08] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal eagles elites is inviting everyone for our Free on – line 3 sessions on Law today](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Justice G R Swaminathan observed that the petitioner firmly states that he is an agriculturist based in Thiruvannamalai district and he had brought the paddy for sale in Thanjavur district as he was told that he would get better price.
- Previous story K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Patty,during British rule many natiolists were arrested for treason.That was why Tilag said that freedom is our birth right! You will be pleased to know in the Alipore case Aurobindo was acquitted.Whether he took spritual ideas are not material in this issue.The speacial counsel brought from Madras (Mr.Norton),&the role played by him in 1906 in the prosecution matters.Why he was brought from Chennai when there were so many barristers raises many eye brows.You may be fascinated by him.Bur what kind of person he was?I will believe shri.Aurubindo who made arecord rather than lawyers here who eulogised him!! Patty Norton rule is only for passing IPC exams.Not for learning the Patriots who were punished by the British.!Be a patriot patty.Not an admirer of a crook!! [6/15, 07:53] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏾
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
More
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
