You may also like...
-
O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory. He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 4, 2022
-
sekarreporter1: Mhc adv vinoth pandian 10 law tips [12/27, 11:03] sekarreporter1: [12/26, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 27, 2022
-


