[5/6, 06:54] Sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/dealer-doesnt-disputed-tax-demand-madras-high-court-quashes-order-confirming-imposition-of-penalty-at-1-5-times-of-tax-demand/110937/ [5/6, 06:55] Sekarreporter1: Tssj Manjula j bench

by Sekar Reporter · May 6, 2021

[5/6, 06:54] Sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/dealer-doesnt-disputed-tax-demand-madras-high-court-quashes-order-confirming-imposition-of-penalty-at-1-5-times-of-tax-demand/110937/
[5/6, 06:55] Sekarreporter1: Tssj Manjula j bench

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Constitution mandates that TN Governor decide asap on NEET reservation Bill: Madras HC A division bench comprising Justices N Kirubakaran and B Pugalendhi observed, “Article 361 of the Constitution gives immunity to the Governor from answering to the court.”

  October 30, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 30, 2020

• 

  Madras high court april 6th day orders

  April 7, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 7, 2022

• 

  Madras High Court dismisses cases filed by Minister I. Periyasamy, family against ED proceedings Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan say, the petitioners could approach the adjudicating authority under the PMLA

  January 5, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 5, 2026