Follow:
- Next story – The Single Judge Bench of Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayan took into consideration the decision of division bench in the case of Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan V. Union of India wherein it was held that if a person does not vacate office and continues to be a director of a company, it is necessary that such person continues to retain the DIN. In this connection, it is also pertinent to point out that it is not possible to file either the financial statements or the annual returns without a DIN. Consequently, the director of the Defaulting Company would be required to retain the DIN so as to make good the deficiency by filing the respective documents. Thus, apart from the fact that the AQD Rules do not empower the ROC to deactivate the DIN, such deactivation would also be contrary to Section 164(2) read with 167(1) of CA 2013 inasmuch as the person concerned would continue to be a director of the Defaulting Company. -+Order passed without disposing objections makes Assessment void: ITAT [Read Order]CBIC extends Validity of AEO Certification to Ease of Renewal Process [
- Previous story Excellent interview singaravelan sir senior advocate by mafffi young advt law student in italy
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
