![[25/11, 14:43] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/LiveLawIndia/status/1993217731857203407?t=22JzSL_Uhu2rAwoQSYtEKg&s=08 [25/11, 14:43] Sekarreporter: Supreme Court Issues Notice On MDMK Leader Vaiko’s Plea Challenging SIR In Tamil Nadu |@DebbyJain #SupremeCourt #TamilNadu #Vaiko #SIR](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story We have no funds to give to you. It’s for the bar councils to take action. We cannot tell the bar council…How can this be part of a direction under Article 32? It is for the Bar Council to take a call…approach BCI.”SC
- Previous story Musings on the Constitution – I Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan What gumption and gall, you may wonder. I am no Granville Seward Austin (Cornerstone of a Nation & Working a Democratic Constitution) or Hans Raj Khanna
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told
More
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told