![[12/6, 18:34] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, Natural justice principles have no universal application. There are Exceptions. Am I correct or wrong sekar? [12/6, 18:44] Sekarreporter: 🙏](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story We have no funds to give to you. It’s for the bar councils to take action. We cannot tell the bar council…How can this be part of a direction under Article 32? It is for the Bar Council to take a call…approach BCI.”SC
- Previous story Musings on the Constitution – I Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan What gumption and gall, you may wonder. I am no Granville Seward Austin (Cornerstone of a Nation & Working a Democratic Constitution) or Hans Raj Khanna
Recent Posts
- 2011 Election case Duraimurugan dismissed by ilanthiriyan judge
- Judge ilanthtiyan Assets exceed income by 124%, court upholds jail terms for officer, wife in corruption case
- I’m not inclined. The legal question of whether custodial interrogation is needed or not is different. This is about the conscience of society,” the court orally observed.
- _EV Velu vs DVAC – Quash FIR in Highways Scam_ | http://CRL.OP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026* _The Hindu_. *PC Act Sec 13 + DVAC FIR + Quash u/s 482 CrPC*. *HJS Criminal Law, UPSC GS-2 Governance*
- Though the petitioner has not filed any quash petition, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in the interest of justice, hence the FIR registered in Crime No.69 of 2024 cannot be sustained and accordingly, the same is quashed. Further, the 1st respondent is directed to permit the petitioner to travel Saudi Arabia by using his Malaysian Passport and also there is no impediment for the
More
Recent Posts
- 2011 Election case Duraimurugan dismissed by ilanthiriyan judge
- Judge ilanthtiyan Assets exceed income by 124%, court upholds jail terms for officer, wife in corruption case
- I’m not inclined. The legal question of whether custodial interrogation is needed or not is different. This is about the conscience of society,” the court orally observed.
- _EV Velu vs DVAC – Quash FIR in Highways Scam_ | http://CRL.OP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026* _The Hindu_. *PC Act Sec 13 + DVAC FIR + Quash u/s 482 CrPC*. *HJS Criminal Law, UPSC GS-2 Governance*
- Though the petitioner has not filed any quash petition, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in the interest of justice, hence the FIR registered in Crime No.69 of 2024 cannot be sustained and accordingly, the same is quashed. Further, the 1st respondent is directed to permit the petitioner to travel Saudi Arabia by using his Malaysian Passport and also there is no impediment for the