You may also like...
-
In the opinion of this Court the orders of transfer must disclose that the competent authority was behind the transfers not only in form but its substance as well. A reference to the approval of the Vice Chancellor in the orders of transfer must be supported by the relevant documents. In the absence of any modicum of participation on the part of Vice Chancellor, the impugned orders. –For Petitioner in W.P.No.10081/2020 : Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Adith Narayan Vijayaraghavan For Respondents in W.P.No.10081/2020 : Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel, Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Abdul Saleem, Standing Counsel for R2 to R4 W.P.No.8650 of 2020 are liable to be declared as not having been passed legally, meeting the mandatory procedural requirements in terms of the University statute and regulations. This Court is unable to persuade itself to accept the disjunctive tabulated sheets containing the names of the transferees and the signatures of the Vice Chancellor underneath the column “Approved” as valid material for sustaining the orders of transfer. The contention that the transfer orders are not passed in terms of the procedure contemplated in the Statute governing the University administration is to be held as well founded, borne out by the records. [3/25, 14:18] Sekarreporter1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order reserved on 18.12.2020 Order delivered on: 25.03.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.Nos.10081, 8650, 10411, 10753,10757 & 14200 of 2020
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 25, 2021
-
Monetary And Financial Dominance Of Husband Cannot Qualify As Cruelty: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings U/S. 498A IPC https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/2025-insc-1471-xxxx-v-state-of-telangana-1601906 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 20, 2025
-
Madras High Court recently held that a presenter of a document for registration cannot seek its return without paying the deficit stamp duty decided by the registering authority or the collector. The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice Mohammed Shaffiq noted
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 30, 2025