![Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1341752968748564480?s=08 [12/23, 21:12] Sekarreporter1: The learned senior counsel Mr. S. Prabakaran has submitted that there were 3 different versions of complaint 2015- a complaint](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Tssj –நீதிபதி பரேஷ் ரவிசங்கர் உபத்யாய் பேச்சு..
- Previous story Judge bavani subrayan bar council super speech
Recent Posts
- Madras High Court on Thursday cautioned that it will dismiss the missing person case against Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation if the petitioner, who moved the Court alleging disappearance of his brother, does not appear in court for hearing.
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
More
Recent Posts
- Madras High Court on Thursday cautioned that it will dismiss the missing person case against Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation if the petitioner, who moved the Court alleging disappearance of his brother, does not appear in court for hearing.
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993