Monthly Archive: April 2026

Kirubakaran former judge interview தவறான முடிவு எடுக்க வேண்டாம்

Kirubakaran former judge interview தவறான முடிவு எடுக்க வேண்டாம்

[28/04, 18:34] sekarreporter1: [28/04, 18:34] sekarreporter1: 👍 [28/04, 19:19] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2049123804069388605 [28/04, 19:19] sekarreporter1: வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை: ஓய் பெற்ற நீதிபதி என் கிருபாகரன் சொன்ன முக்கிய தகவல்.. சன் நியூஸ் பேட்டி

affidavits to bear the expenses in the event of resigning. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain this writ petition and the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 28.04.2026 Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes

2026:MHC:1612 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP(MD) No.12161 of 2026 K.Mani S/o.Kannan, No.3/205,...

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt adjourns to tomorrow (April 29, 2026) a case related to the release of Chiyan Vikram’s long awaited movie Dhruva Natchathiram. Today, the movie’s director Gautam Vasudev Menon filed an affidavit listing out the number of debtors to whom money had to be paid and said, if they get paid, the movie could be released by the end of May. However, senior counsel Srinath Sridevan and s r sundar for the two investors K. Punniamoorthy and K. Premkumar, who had approached the court and obtained an injunction against the release, sought a day’s time to verify the large sums of money shown as debt by Mr. Menon. Hence, the judge adjourned the hearing by a day. @THChennai

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt adjourns to tomorrow (April 29, 2026) a case related to the release of Chiyan Vikram’s long awaited movie Dhruva Natchathiram. Today, the movie’s director Gautam Vasudev Menon filed an...

Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi , ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED. Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both Appellant counsel N.Ramakrishnan and ED prosecutor Sidharthan ,the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal and adj the case by 4 weeks to file reply by Ed

Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi , ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining ED...

Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi , ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED. Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both sides the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal and adj the case by 4 weeks to file reply by Ed Regards P.Sidharthan RC and Spl PP [28/04, 14:39] sekarreporter1: Today before 2nd bench

[28/04, 14:39] sekarreporter1: Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi , ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of...

Vinothpandian: Madras High court : crlop 3541 of 2026 dated 10th March 2026 : Anbalagan vs State of Tamil Nadu : with regard to quash petition filed by the petitioner for an alleged offence under the prevention of corruption act , court observed proceedings cannot transform into a mini trial and thereby quash proceedings dismissed

Vinothpandian: Madras High court : crlop 3541 of 2026 dated 10th March 2026 : Anbalagan vs State of Tamil Nadu : with regard to quash petition filed by the petitioner for an alleged offence under the prevention of corruption act , court observed proceedings cannot transform into a mini trial and thereby quash proceedings dismissed

[28/04, 14:30] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : crlop 3541 of 2026 dated 10th March 2026 : Anbalagan vs State of Tamil Nadu : with regard to quash petition filed by the petitioner for an...

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A(MD)No.423 of 2026 S.Balaji         … Appellant Vs. M.A.Mahaboobani                                                     … Respondent

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON             : 22.04.2026                   PRONOUNCED ON     :  28.04.2026                  CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A(MD)No.423 of 2026 S.Balaji        ...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com