Follow:
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P(MD)No. 7604 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD) No.6236 of 2026 Sathiyaraj … Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Chennai -34.
- HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.1956 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Vaiko General Secretary Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, ‘Thayagam’
- [07/04, 17:26] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxq78CQcp0jnREsPBx8WHzOShu8GwVjvjH?si=1AM8seX_bUknb7Sm [07/04, 17:27] sekarreporter1: STORY | Woman can’t be treated as ‘untouchable’ for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case A woman cannot be treated as “untouchable” for three days in a month and then cease to be considered untouchable on the fourth day, Supreme Court judge BV Nagarathna remarked on Tuesday. The remark came while a nine-judge bench was hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala temple of Keralam, and on the ambit and scope of religious freedom practised by multiple faiths. The constitution bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices B V Nagarathna, M M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…
- Judgment Allowing Women Entry In Sabarimala Temple Wrong: Centre Tells Supreme Court In 9-Judge Bench Reference |@TheBeshbaha
- Savukku Shankar is an absconding accused, Greater Chennai City Police told #MadrasHighCourt today. Appearing before Justice M. Nirmal Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor R. Muniyapparaj said, Savukku Shankar has now filed a couple of petitions seeking a CBI probe in two of the criminal cases pending against him though the city police had already concluded the investigation in both the cases and filed charge sheets. However, since a junior counsel sought time for the appearance of a senior counsel on behalf of the petitioner, the judge adjourned the hearing on the two petitions to April 27, 2026 @THChennai
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P(MD)No. 7604 of 2026and W.M.P.(MD) No.6236 of 2026 Sathiyaraj … Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department Chennai -34.
- HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.No.1956 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Vaiko General Secretary Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, ‘Thayagam’
- [07/04, 17:26] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxq78CQcp0jnREsPBx8WHzOShu8GwVjvjH?si=1AM8seX_bUknb7Sm [07/04, 17:27] sekarreporter1: STORY | Woman can’t be treated as ‘untouchable’ for 3 days: Justice Nagarathna in Sabarimala case A woman cannot be treated as “untouchable” for three days in a month and then cease to be considered untouchable on the fourth day, Supreme Court judge BV Nagarathna remarked on Tuesday. The remark came while a nine-judge bench was hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala temple of Keralam, and on the ambit and scope of religious freedom practised by multiple faiths. The constitution bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices B V Nagarathna, M M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…
- Judgment Allowing Women Entry In Sabarimala Temple Wrong: Centre Tells Supreme Court In 9-Judge Bench Reference |@TheBeshbaha
- Savukku Shankar is an absconding accused, Greater Chennai City Police told #MadrasHighCourt today. Appearing before Justice M. Nirmal Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor R. Muniyapparaj said, Savukku Shankar has now filed a couple of petitions seeking a CBI probe in two of the criminal cases pending against him though the city police had already concluded the investigation in both the cases and filed charge sheets. However, since a junior counsel sought time for the appearance of a senior counsel on behalf of the petitioner, the judge adjourned the hearing on the two petitions to April 27, 2026 @THChennai