![*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
Recent Posts
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*
- State of Manipur is under ventilator. Please bring it to the normalcy by restoring democracy through elections and do justice to the people of that State. How long will the State Assembly will be under suspension and Parliament will usurp the role of State chair
- Judge:* Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan – *Case:* In Re: Installation of Flagpoles on Roads – *Date of Order:* December 4, 2025
More
Recent Posts
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*
- State of Manipur is under ventilator. Please bring it to the normalcy by restoring democracy through elections and do justice to the people of that State. How long will the State Assembly will be under suspension and Parliament will usurp the role of State chair
- Judge:* Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan – *Case:* In Re: Installation of Flagpoles on Roads – *Date of Order:* December 4, 2025